Lipitor Lawsuit Claims the Drug Lowers Cholesterol, But Causes Onset of Type 2 Diabetes

The whole reason to take Lipitor is to enjoy a long and healthy future, which is why so many were shocked in 2012 when the FDA announced that the Lipitor is one of the cholesterol-reducing statins which can trigger both high blood sugar levels and Type 2 diabetes. It was only at this point that Pfizer became required to increase the severity of the warning labels attached to bottles of Lipitor, labels that did nothing to help the millions of people who had already been taking the medication as a means of controlling their cholesterol levels.

Now courts all over the United States are being inundated with Lipitor lawsuits. Following the FDA’s 2012 announcement about statin drugs, a group approached the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and requested that Lipitor lawsuits be passed on to the District of South Carolina where they would be consolidated. A little less than a year later, Pfizer, Lipitor’s manufacture, objected to the entire lawsuit transfer process. The sheer volume of lawsuits prompted the federal government to create the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) which has the task of handling Lipitor lawsuits. At this point, the MDL is currently sorting out more than 300 separate cases while more cases get filed in state courts all over the country.

When patients took prescription Lipitor it’s because they wanted a bright and healthy future, they didn’t expect that the very medication that lowered their blood pressure and decreased the odds of them developing heart disease was at the same time creating Type 2 diabetes, a disease that creates serious and difficult to treat health problems. Had the individuals who took Lipitor prior to 2012 known what we know now, they could have taken precautions, including carefully monitoring their blood glucose to determine if they were at risk for developing Type 2 diabetes. Many believe that Pfizer was negligent in not making sure the public was properly informed, which is why so many Lipitor lawsuits have been filed in recent years. More often than not, the plaintiff in these cases have been awarded a substantial settlement to help with punitive damages.

Type 2 diabetes represents a serious health risk and can seriously lower an individual’s quality of life. Not only will the individual have to carefully monitor their blood glucose levels for the rest of their life, but it’s also likely that they will experience slower healing times and be at a greater risk of infection. Many people find that they are more susceptible to various types of health problems after they’ve developed Type 2 Diabetes. Many individuals who have been diagnosed with this form of diabetes have been forced to make intense life style changes. You can learn more at rxinjuryhelp.

If you were prescribed Lipitor prior to 2012 and have developed Type 2 Diabetes that your doctor feels was statin induced, it’s in your best interest to contact an experienced attorney and arrange for a consultation. They will walk you through the steps you need to take in order to file a Lipitor lawsuit and receive a settlement that will help cover expenses such as loss wages and medical bills.







Bringing Your Offshore Accounts Into Compliance

Since the first Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) was enacted in 2009, over $7 billion has been collected from more than 50,000 disclosures. The IRS is very proud of this, of course, because it means they’ve been able to recover unpaid taxes without the costs of detailed investigation and litigation. Thanks to its popularity and continued interest, the IRS continue to keep the program open. If you have considered voluntarily disclosing information about an offshore account, meeting with a tax law attorney can help you determine how to proceed.

What is OVDP?
The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program allows someone who has kept an undisclosed offshore account to disclose that account without legal ramifications. Whether a taxpayer willingly or knowingly hid money in an offshore account isn’t at question, especially since the IRS knows that sometimes an offshore account is the result of a scam on an unknowing taxpayer. Regardless, it is a legal issue and there are tax implications.

What Does It Entail?
An OVDP will require that you file eight years of amended tax returns. You will then owe the government any taxes found unpaid during those eight years, plus interest and a penalty of 27.5%. It can seem like a lot, but it’s better than jail time.

Who Should Apply?
If an offshore account has been keeping you up at night, you may want to consider an OVDP. The IRS is not only responsible for collecting taxes, but also for investigating fraudulent returns and loopholes. They can pursue these matters in court. By offering OVDP, they are effectively offering a workaround for those who fear jail time if discovered—even if their participation was unintentional.

Other Programs
OVDP is not the right program for every taxpayer. Just like the IRS has various forms for different situations, they also have different programs. A trustworthy tax law attorney can help steer you towards the right program for you and the IRS, helping you settle your tax burden. Domestic Tax Evasion Amnesty and Foreign Tax Evasion Amnesty programs are available and may be better suited for your situation.

A knowledgeable tax relief law firm will help you navigate the murky waters of tax law. Using their in depth knowledge of the tax code, a tax law attorney will help you deal with the IRS through a stressful time. They can help you better understand OVDP and counsel you through the process.

Some tax relief law firms specialize in OVDP and are especially suited to help taxpayers, even if they are living abroad. They understand the stress and anxiety that can result from dealing with the IRS and focus on creating a judgment-free zone to help their clients through a difficult time. As always, the best way to understand your options when it comes to OVDP is to make an appointment for a consultation with a tax law attorney. As with any legal issue, it is best to deal with tax issues as soon as possible.

Federal Security Guard Gunned Down By Angry Whistle Blower


Kevin Downing spent 16 years ranting against the federal government, nursing a grudge after he lost his job. For years, he claimed that he was wrongly fired for confronting his bosses about a plan to build a new headquarters for the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Downing told anyone who would listen that the federal government was wasting money and he insisted that he was a whistle blower that had been victimized. Then one day, he snapped. Downing walked into a federal office building and shot a security guard and then took his own life.


Downing had repeatedly appealed to his congressman and to local newspapers to consider his story. Rep. Bill Pascrell said he considered the man’s claims and actually thought he might actually be partially right in that he was fired unjustly. “We felt that this person had been given a raw deal, to put it mildly,” Pascrell said. “There was no excuse for it and he had been treated very badly.”


Though a lot of time has passed since Downing was fired, he was still campaigning to get his job back. Convinced he was now protected by legislation aimed at guarding federal whistleblowers, he started a petition and sought support from the National Taxpayers Union. Neighbors report that Downing was also dealing with some personal problems. His fiancé had recently died and he was facing a real possibility that he could lose his home.


So one day he walked into a federal building that housed an office for the Department of Labor and he lost it, gunning down an innocent security guard and then turning the gun on himself.


His friend, Rivka Glickman, said she was heartbroken to hear the news. “He flipped or something,” she said. “I feel he went through a terrible crisis because he was always a very well-mannered, calm person. Something made him snap.”


Idrissa Camara was the security guard on duty when Downing entered the building with a gun. He was killed instantly. Camara’s family is grieving his death and questioning why he was targeted. Originally from the Ivory Coast, Camara moved to America to seek a better life. “He just came here for the American dream,” his cousin said. “We are asking ourselves, ‘This is the American dream?’ Being killed in your job for nothing?”


Unfortunately, Camara is not the only person to be unfairly murdered this year. In fact, guns are expected to surpass car crashes as the leading cause of American deaths in 2015. When a loved one is murdered, it’s hard to figure out who is really at fault. In Camara’s case, the obvious answer is that Downing was the one responsible since he was holding the gun. But you have to also consider who sold him that gun and whether he would have ever used it to murder Camara if he was treated fairly by his employers. Sometimes a wrongful death is difficult to unravel.


That’s why you should seek the help of a wrongful death attorney in Tampa if you are ever faced with a tragedy like this one. When you unexpectedly lose a loved one, it can be hard to know what to do next. In many cases, loss of a family member will leave surviving dependents in a financial hardship. A Tampa wrongful death attorney can help you determine if there was negligence involved that contributed to your loved one’s death. You might have cause to file a wrongful death claim. Contact a Tampa wrongful death attorney today for a free consultation at 1-800-225-5564.